Professional and Policy Issues of Interest to MAA Members

Official web site of the MAA Committee on Science Policy and the MAA Committee on the Profession
Fall 2002

This report contains news and opinion concerning educational and policy issues relevant to the MAA. Opinions expressed are those of individual authors and do not necessarily represent official positions of the Mathematical Association of America.

Research & Development and Related Funding
Higher Education, Employment & Workforce
Elementary and Secondary Education
Policy Perspectives
Common Abbreviations
Past Reports
SPC Charge
COP Charge

Research & Development and Related Funding

The FY 2003 budget cycle kicked off on February 4, 2002, with President Bush's presentation to Congress of the administration's funding proposals.

PERSPECTIVES ON FUNDING Below, with links to subsites of this site and to other sites, we present three perspectives on funding issues of interest to mathematical scientists.

OSTP: The 2003 budget requests record levels for federal R & D ($111.8 billion, an 8 percent increase.

AAAS: Bush Proposes Large Increases for DOD, NIH R & D; Mix of Cuts and Increases for Other R & D Programs with an overall increase of 8.3 percent over FY 2002.

CNSF: The Coalition for National Science Funding, to which MAA belongs, publishes periodic summaries of federal research allocations and proposals, and these reports are available at http://www.cnsfweb.org. For the FY 2003 NSF budget, CNSF recommends an increase of $718 million (or 15 percent) for the FY 2003 above the FY 2002 level of $4.79 billion, bringing the agency's budget to $5.508 billion.

HOW TO TRACK THE PROGRESS OF LEGISLATION

The American Association for the Advancement of Scence (AAAS) maintains a website where you can track the progress of various authorization and appropriation bills. See http://www.aaas.org/spp/rd/approp03.htm

Another useful tool in following the progress of proposed legislation can be found at http://thomas.loc.gov. You can search by a bill's reference number or by key words.

PROGRESS NOTES

National Science Board Recommends NSF Budget Emphasize S&E Infrastructure

In a surprising move, NSF Director Rita Colwell wrote a letter on September 17, 2002, opposing proposals to significantly increase the NSF budget that would lead to a doubling over the next five years. A news report about her letter can be found at the SSTI website.

A bill that would increase the NSF budget by 15% in FY2003 was approved by a House subcommittee and sent to the full House Science Committee. On September 3, a Senate committee favorably reported out a bill called the "National Science Foundation Doubling Act" that proposes to double the NSF budget over the next five years. This is an authorization bill, not an appropriations bill.

A bill called the "Technology Talent Act" was passed by the House on July 9 and sent to the Senate for review. On September 6, the Senate Education Committee recommended approval of a bipartisan Techology Talent proposal associated with re-authorization legislation for NSF. Senate committee press release.

A Senate Committee has proposed that the Mathematics and Science Partnership program, a program designed to strengthen pre-college science and mathematics education, be moved from the Department of Education to the National Science Foundation. This is an authorization bill, not an appropriations bill.

Both houses of Congress have passed a bill that, if implemented by appropriations bills, would significantly increase the NSF budget. President Bush is expected to sign.


Higher Education, Employment & Workforce (Full Details)

NSF Beat is a column by Sharon Cutler Ross giving a May/June update on NSF funding and new programs.

The CBMS2000 report on undergraduate programs in the mathematical sciences is now available at http://www.ams.org/cbms/. The report presents longitudinal data on mathematical sciences enrollments, majors, curriculum, and faculty. In addition, the CBMS2000 report studies the spread of calculus reform, distance learning, dual enrollments, the mathematical education of pre-service K-8 teachers, and the educational background of faculty teaching undergraduate statistics. Mathematics departments in two- and four-year colleges and universities will receive copies of the report, and individuals may purchase hard copies from the American Mathematical Society, or may down-load the report from the web site above.

ENROLLMENTS: Upper division undergraduate enrollments and bachelors degrees awarded have declined. These phenomena continue the pattern of decline over more than a decade. Lower division mathematics enrollment have increased.

ACADEMIC EMPLOYMENT in mathematics has also declined along with decline in upper division enrollments and degrees, in terms of tenure and tenure-track positions. Employment of temporary, part-time, and full time non-tenure track employment in mathematics has increased.

DISPARITY in the scope and range of programs for majors in mathematics between bachelors-only and doctoral granting programs that has always existed, may be growing to the point where a two separate but unequal systems for undergraduate mathematics education may be developing.

[Source: Preliminary Report of CBMS2000 Survey, ]


Elementary and Secondary Education (Full Details)

The Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences has just completed a report titled the Mathematical Education of Teachers. This report is designed as a resource for mathematics faculty in colleges and universities involved in education of elementary and secondary teachers of mathematics.

A pending bill would replace the Department of Education's research arm with a separate academy for educational research, would create federal standards for federally sponsored educational research and would do away with the Eisenhower Regional Mathematics Consortia and Eisenhower Clearinghouses. Further details of the proposal are available from http://www.edweek.org/ew/newstory.cfm?slug=34oeri.h21

Congress Passes Bill to Overhaul Federal Education Research: Congress has approved legislation that replaces the Department of Education's Office of Educational Research and Improvement with a more independent Institute of Education Sciences. The new institute will attempt to shake out the most effective teaching methods through scientifically sound studies. "Without sound science to back the claims of increased academic achievement, schools are often disappointed," said Representative Michael Castle (R-Delaware), who sponsored the legislation. The institute will be overseen by a new National Board for Education Sciences. The members of the board, as well as the institute's director, will be appointed by the president. The institute's findings will be compiled and distributed to educators and policy makers by a Knowledge Utilization Office. The American Educational Research Association praised the legislation, saying it provides political independence for the institute and "improves prospects for developing a culture of research that has been lacking" in education studies. Abstract from the NASSMC Briefing Service (NBS) that is supported by the National Security Agency (NSA) and ExxonMobil Foundation, Saturday, October 26, 2002. Full article is in the Chronicle of Higher Education (Daily News), October 21, 2002.


Policy Perspectives (Full Details)

"Having a science policy at all implies that we have a systematic way of ordering the opportunities so finite resources can be invested to best effect." -- John Marburger

John Marburger, Director, OSTP and Science Advisor to the President sets forth the policy position behind the priorities expressed in the budget document.

William Kirwan President of the Ohio State University, sets forth a perspective -- relating particularly to mathematics - on how the current social context impacts on the profession and sets forth an action agenda in response.


Past Reports on Professional and Policy Issues

Summer 2002 Report
March 7, 2002 Report



| About the MAA | Member Services | Publications | Sections |
| Meetings | Professional Development | Students | Home |

Copyright ©2002 The Mathematical Association of America

On behalf of the MAA Committee on Science Policy and The Committee on the Profession, the Content Editor of the MAA Science Policy page is Ken Millett of University of California, Santa Barbara while the Web Editor is Sarah J. Greenwald of Appalachian State University. Please send comments, suggestions, or corrections about this page to millett@math.ucsb.edu


Last Modified: - Greenwald